
Lately, the media industry in Nigeria has been redefining
itself by gravitating from traditional reporting to material that appeals to
social media users. Because of this change, democratic systems, society’s
conversations and journalists’ place are all affected. While the press
originally watched out for the public and held the government accountable, now
it typically waits for news on social media and chooses not to investigate
pressing issues.
It is not only a matter for academics but also poses a serious
threat to democracy in Nigeria. Abandoning the job of investigative journalism,
focusing on trends and using clickbait often leads to a situation where the
media fail to help the public and instead make superficial reporting the norm.
The analysis focuses on the impacts of several crises in
Nigerian journalism, such as slow investigative reporting, managers who limit
freedom of the press and online trends that have changed both news production
and how news is spread.
Nigeria's Digital Media Landscape
Social media is vastly influencing news in Nigeria, and it
offers important insights into the current crisis. Recent figures reveal that
there were 36.75 million social media users in Nigeria in January 2024, which
translates to 16.2 per cent of the entire population. Although the figure is a
lot higher than in prior years, with the number of social media users jumping
from 18 million in 2017 to 34 million in 2022 and experts project there will be
over 90 million users on social media in Nigeria by 2025.
When we consider how rapidly social media is expanding, the
idea that most Nigerians hear the news on these platforms, with Facebook
leading at 64% in news sharing, becomes clearer. It shows that not only do
people consume information differently, but also how information is shared has
been greatly modified.
Since traditional media outlets are struggling financially,
this makes the challenge even bigger. In February 2024, the National Bureau of
Statistics said headline inflation jumped to 32%, which created more challenges
for businesses, shrank their profits and led media firms to downsize. Due to
these economic limitations, media groups usually post fast social media
information over time-consuming investigative stories.
The Corrosive Impact of Brown Envelope Journalism
Meaningful coverage in Nigeria can be purchased with cash
payments, harming the honesty of Nigerian media. Now, this unethical behavior
is so accepted that it changes both how individual journalists and the whole
media industry put out stories.
Accepting money from tip-givers instead of investigating on
their own affects the reporter’s relationship with the subject. This change in
journalism means that newspapers end up putting profit before keeping the
public well informed. As a result, people stop trusting media organizations and
often question the reasons for each story they see.
As a result, journalists are encouraged to focus more on
making promotional stories than on their actual investigative duties. Reporters
are less likely to look into matters that could displease major powers, and the
articles aimed at pleasing advertisers are often successful. For this reason,
Nigerian media usually focus on what is trendy instead of tackling sensitive
subjects that could cause controversy.
Social Media's Dominance Over Traditional Journalism
When you observe the patterns of how people receive media in
Nigeria, the changes in the media landscape become obvious. Sixty-seven per
cent of people from Nigeria mentioned in a survey conducted in 2024 that they
used social media for news, which is considered one of the highest in the
world. Because so many people use social media for news, the methods of
creating, sharing and accessing information in Nigeria have changed.
A poll conducted in Nigeria between January and February
2023 discovered that Facebook was the main platform for sharing news at 64 per
cent. It means that Facebook has now overtaken everyday newspapers and other
media in telling Nigerians the news, proving that traditional newspapers are no
longer as important.
Due to how popular social media is, people now rush to share information quickly instead of making sure it is accurate. With social media offering results more quickly, newspapers and other media groups have mostly stopped performing thorough investigations to share thoughts on current trends. For this reason, information that is not proven often gets spread fast among people, usually before the truth is checked, which leads to more misinformation.
Case 1: The Troubles of Benjamin Daniel Ojukwu
Daniel Ojukwu’s case indicates that Nigerian journalism can
be very dangerous, especially for real investigative journalists. Those who
support freedom of the press are objecting to the arrest of Daniel Ojukwu, an
investigative journalist and his continued detention by the police. Lagos
police detained Daniel Ojukwu on May 1 after he released a story on corruption.
They indicate that investigative journalists are often
intimidated in this system. Nigería’s constitution states that those accused of
a crime should be brought before a court within 48 hours following arrest. For
more than nine days, Ojukwu has been held in detention without being charged,
which is against his constitutional rights and legal standards. It was alleged
that he was arrested because he investigated government corruption, while
cybercrime laws were offered as the justification for the detention.
The case proves how carrying out thorough journalistic work
has come to be against the law in Nigeria. Even though Ojukwu investigated
corruption in public institutions and behaved like a journalistic investigator,
he was regarded as a criminal instead of someone who was looking out for
society’s good. Additionally, those who spread trending stories on social media
and in blogs are not punished, showing that the government cares more about
easy publicity than real probing.
Case Study 2: The #EndBadGovernance Protests
August 2024 saw the #EndBadGovernance protests, which made
it clear how press freedom in Nigeria is threatened. More than 56 journalists
suffered attacks, were taken into custody or were hit with tear gas by security
forces while covering the protests. This meant there was a major increase in
restrictions on the media, as journalists were attacked for trying to do their
jobs.
Even though police killed at least 24 people during the
nationwide #Endbadgovernance protests from 1-10 August, mainstream media paid
less notice to how the same police assaulted journalists covering the events.
Because these attacks are very calculated, one can suspect a plan to keep fair
reporting away from the protests and what came after.
How the mass media reacted to these events was quite
noticeable. Instead of joining those under attack or covering the protests,
many journalists preferred to avoid danger and only talk about trending topics
and online videos. The shift from writing reports to analyzing social media
from a studio denotes a major break in the role of the media.
Social Media's Double-Edged Impact on Nigerian Journalism
How news is delivered and created in Nigeria has changed
greatly because of social media. Although social media has helped both average
people and journalists share their reports, it has also made it more likely
that people share inaccurate or shallow news first to maintain popularity.
With social media constantly updating, it becomes very hard
for traditional sources to attract new audiences. The result of this
competition has caused numerous news outlets to use social media to respond
right away instead of doing careful research. Because of this, journalists tend
to select topics based on what’s popular and often do not spend much time on
stories in depth.
The Misinformation Challenge
Misinformation and disinformation become common because
fact-checking cannot keep up with the fast information sharing on social media.
You could see this occurrence during the 2023 elections in Nigeria, where sites
that were not familiar ran news to sway people’s opinions. Thanks to the quick
tempo on social media, these platforms could spread incorrect news before it
was investigated and challenged by established media.
The problem has increased since misleading stories usually
attract more readers, making it more profitable for the news companies to focus
on thrilling stories than on factual reports. Once clicks and shares are the
main standards of achievement, following accuracy, fairness and serving the
public takes a back seat.
Using Digital Platforms to Control Politics
Because of the connection between the government and media
companies, independent journalism in Nigeria experiences further challenges.
There have been instances when politicians and government officials change the
look of online environments to promote particular plans, since in several
cases, media companies are run by political leaders. When the media is mainly
owned by the same people in power, it limits the ability of independent
journalists to do reporting that could challenge the politicians’ views and
interests.
If media depend on political patrons instead of public
concern, their drive shifts from accountability to what benefits the media
outlets’ owners. The trend is why more people watch and produce “safe”
entertainment material, while the amount of investigative journalism decreases.
The Economic Dimensions of Journalism's Decline
The low budgets and financial difficulties in Nigerian media
are tied to more people getting their information from social media instead of
material from investigative journalism. The usual sources of funds for many
journalism companies—advertising and circulation—have been disrupted since
digital platforms are grabbing a lot of advertising revenue.
With an unstable economy, investigative journalism is
especially difficult to keep up with, because it costs a lot in terms of time,
people, lawyers and various security measures, while the outcome is rarely
clear. Content created for social media can be produced fast and cheaply, and
advertisers pay attention to the instant results it gets.
The level of inflation at 32% in February 2024 makes it more
difficult by increasing operating costs, but advertising money is not rising.
If media organizations do not pay their journalists’ wages on time, they end up
focusing on immediate solutions instead of allocating money for in-depth
investigations.
International Context and Comparative Analysis
Nigeria’s journalism crisis relates to a worldwide drop in
press freedom and changes in traditional methods of journalism. At the same
time, there are very serious difficulties in Nigeria. A combination of economic
troubles, political pressure and fast adoption of social media hastens the end
of investigative journalism.
With a large population and lots of people using social
media, Nigeria is an important example to study when exploring how digital
services impact the media scene in Africa. Because nearly 90 million people in
Nigeria will use social media by 2025, any developments there may show what is
coming for other parts of the continent.
Consequences for Democratic Governance
When investigative reporting is less common, it can
negatively affect how things are run in Nigeria. If the press does not oversee
those in power, corruption will flourish without being noticed, decisions on
public policy will not be well-examined, and people will not have the details
needed for informed participation in democracy.
Because social media promotes certain stories, many key but
complicated issues aren’t given enough attention and meaningless or sensational
ones are. So, the public tends to shape opinions based mainly on buzzing topics
rather than learning in depth about government problems.
When journalists are constantly threatened, the rest of the
information system is affected. Instead of investigating these stories on their
own, journalists censor themselves since they could be in danger for reporting the information.
Technological Solutions and Challenges
Though technology has caused many obstacles in Nigerian
journalism, it can also be used to find answers. Thanks to digital technology,
there are new methods of investigative journalism, for example, gathering
information from a community, examining data and communicating securely with
sources.
Still, getting these benefits means supporting people’s
digital skills, teaching cybersecurity and changing business models to ensure
investigative reporting continues in today’s digital world. Making sure
technology preserves traditional journalistic values like accuracy, fairness,
and public service is the main challenge.
Reviving the Fourth Estate
Fixing today’s challenges in Nigerian journalism should
focus on tackling both its systems and traditions. There are several important
areas where intervention should happen.
Making Regulatory and Legal Changes
Misusing cybercrime laws against journalists must be
resolved through changes in the law that protect real journalism and still
punish those who commit cyber crimes. The revision of cyberstalking laws in
Nigeria in February 2024 is progress, but more substantial efforts are
important to ensure that investigative journalism is encouraged, not
discouraged by laws.
Economic Support for Independent Media
Getting an ongoing revenue stream for investigative
journalism is important for the future of the media. Examples could be public
funds for investigative journalism, tax reductions for good reporting and
financial support systems for quality journalism, not engagement.
Professional Development and Safety Training
Those who work in journalism benefit from both training and
support because the field has become very complex. Digital security, knowledge
of legal matters and career development courses that promote doing things
ethically and using proper methods of investigation should be included.
Public Media Literacy
If people know more about media literacy and why independent
journalism matters, there will be greater interest in good news and less
support for misleading information. People need proper education to be able to
see the difference between credible and non-credible sources, since this is
essential for quality journalism to thrive.
Assuring Journalists Safety
Measures to secure journalists against harassment, intimidation
and violence are basic to achieving press freedom. Such measures include
putting in place laws, practical security and changing society’s attitudes to
see that independent journalism is fundamental to democracy.
Conclusion
The way Nigerian journalism is heading now means it is not
only harming the media but also directly challenges how the country is ruled.
Since traditional journalism is fading out in favor of social media sites, the
role of the press in watching over public figures is weakening. Thanks to this
shift, sharing news without fact-checking is more common, which lowers the
trust people have in media and institutions. If journalism does not challenge
those in power but mainly agrees with the public, democracy is weakened.
Because of digital media, people in Nigeria now have many
new ways to access news, and 36 million users in 2024 are expected to grow to
90 million by 2025. Nevertheless, the shift to digital has not led to changes
that defend journalistic integrity. Reporting in 2024 could be dangerous, as
shown by the fact that 45 of the 69 journalists attacked were targeted by the
police and other authorities. Because of these challenges, many journalists
avoid writing important stories, and this underlines the importance of shielding
and supporting freedom of the press.
True revival of Nigerian journalism as the Fourth Estate
calls for multiple changes: better laws for journalists, ways to finance
investigative journalism, improvements in journalists’ careers and a change in
cultural attitudes toward independent media. With Nigeria going through
political and social changes, how strong and independent the press is will help
decide its path to democracy. Innovation in the media should always lift and
support journalism’s role in a strong democracy.